Quantum Mechanics Literature



 
Popular Press

Review and Intoductory Articles

Books

 
Entanglement


 
Measurement


 
Other


 
Experiment


Return to research page.   Return to homepage.


 Popular Press

Articles from the mainstream media and popular scientific press sorted by date. Some links require registration.

Review and Introductory Articles


Entanglement

General

  1. A. Acin, A. Andrianov, E. Jane, and R. Tarrach, "Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms," LANL preprint quant-ph/0009107 (2000).
  2. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, "Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations," Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046-52 (1996).
  3. S. Bose, V. Vedral, and P. L. Knight, "Purification via entanglement swapping and conserved entanglement," Phys. Rev. A 60, 194-7 (1999).
  4. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, "Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles," Phys. Rev. Lett , 910-3 (2001).
  5. P.-X. Chen, L.-M. Liang, C.-Z. Li, and M.-Q. Huang, "Necessary and sufficient condition of separability of any system" Phys. Rev. A 63, 052306 (2001).
  6. J. I. Cirac, W. Dür, B. Kraus, and M. Lewenstein, "Entangling operations and their implementation using a small amount of entanglement" Phys. Rev. Lett 86, 544-7 (2001).
  7. D. Collins and S. Popescu, "Classical analog of entanglement," Phys. Rev. A 65, 032321 (2002).
  8. W. Dür, "Multipartite entanglement that is robust against disposal of particles," Phys. Rev. A 63, 020303 (2001).
  9. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, "Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways," Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
  10. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki, "Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions," Phys. Lett. A 223, 1-8 (1996).
  11. R. B. Lockhart, M. J. Steiner, and K. Gerlach, "Geometry and Product States," LANL preprint quant-ph/0010013 (2000).
  12. S. Massar, D. Bacon, N. J. Cerf, and R.. Cleve, "Classical simulation of quantum entanglement without local hidden variables," Phys. Rev. A 63, 052305 (2001).
  13. M. A. Nielsen, "Conditions for a Class of Entanglement Transformations," Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 436-9 (1999).
  14. A. Peres, "Separability Criterion for Density Matrices" Phys. Rev. Lett 77, 1413-15 (1996).
  15. B. M. Terhal, "Detecting Quantum Entanglement," LANL preprint quant-ph/0101032 (2001).
  16. A. V. Thapliyal, "Multipartite pure-state entanglement," Phys. Rev. A 59, 3336-42 (1999).
  17. M. Ziman and V. Buzek, "Equally distant, partially entangled alphabet states for quantum channels," Phys. Rev. A 62, 052301 (2000).

Measurement

General

  1. R. B. M. Clarke, V. M. Kendon, A. Chefles, S. M. Barnett, E. Riis, and M. Sasaki, "Experimental realization of optimal detection strategies for overcomplete states," Phys. Rev. A 63 040305 (2001).
  2. S. Franke-Arnold, E. Andersson, S. M. Barnett, and S. Stenholm, "Generalized measurements of atomic qubits," Phys. Rev. A 63, 052301 (2001).

Other

  1. A Acín, A Andrianov, E Jané and R Tarrach, "Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms," J. Phys. A 34, 6725-39
  2. H. Barnum, C. M. Caves, J. Finkelstein, C. A. Fuchs, R. Schack, "Quantum probability from decision theory?" Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 456, 1175-82 (2000)
  3. C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack"Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities," Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002).
  4. D. Deutsch, "Quantum theory of probability and decisions," Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455, 3129-37 (1999).
  5. A. K. Ekert, C. M. Alves, D. K. L. Oi, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and L. C. Kwek"Direct Estimations of Linear and Nonlinear Functionals of a Quantum State," Phys. Rev. Lett 88, 217901 (2002).
  6. C. A. Fuchs and K. Jacobs, "Information-tradeoff relations for finite-strength quantum measurements," Phys. Rev. A 63, 062305 (2001).
  7. M. Raginsky, "A fidelity measure for quantum channels," Phys. Lett. A 290, 11-18 (2001).
  8. V. Vedral, "The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory," Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 197-234 (2002).
  9. K. G. H. Vollbrecht and R. F. Werner, "Why two qubits are special," J. Math. Phys. 41, 6772-82 (2000).

Dynamics

  1. D. Collins, N. Linden, and S. Popescu, "Nonlocal content of quantum operations," Phys. Rev. A. 64, 032302 (2001).
  2. G. M. D'Ariano and P. Lo Presti, "Optimal nonuniversally covariant cloning," Phys. Rev. A. 64, 042308 (2001).
  3. B. Kraus, W. Dür, G. Vidal, J. I. Cirac, M. Lewenstein, N. Linden, and S. Popescu, "Entanglement Capability of Two-qubit Operations," Z. Naturforsch. A 56, 91-9 (2001). arXiv preprint quant-ph/0006034.
  4. E. M. Fortunato, L. Viola, J. Hodges, G. Teklemariam and D. G. Cory, "Implementation of universal control on a decoherence-free qubit," New J. Phys. 4, 5 (2002).
  5. L. Hardy and D. D. Song, "Nonlinear qubit transformations," Phys. Rev. A. 64, 032301 (2001).
  6. G. J. Milburn, R. Laflamme, B. C. Sanders, and E. Knill, "Quantum dynamics of two coupled qubits," Phys. Rev. A. 65, 032316 (2002).
  7. V. Ramakrishna, R. J. Ober, K. L. Flores, and H. Rabitz , "Control of a coupled two-spin system without hard pulses," Phys. Rev. A. 65, 063405 (2002).
  8. W. van Dam, F. Magniez, M. Mosca, and M. Santha, "Self-testing of One-Qubit Gates," Proc. 32nd ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, p688-96 (2000).
  9. S. J. van Enk and H. J. Kimble, "On the classical character of control fields in quantum information processing," Quantum Info. Comput. 2, 1-13 (2002). arXiv preprint:quant-ph/0107088.
  10. P. Zanardi, "Entanglement of quantum evolutions," Phys. Rev. A. 63, 040304 (2001).
  11. P. Zanardi, C. Zalka, and L. Faoro, "Entangling power of quantum evolutions," Phys. Rev. A. 62, 030301 (2000).

Decoherence and Dissipation

  1. L. Accardi, S. V. Kozyrev, and I. V. Volovich, "Dynamics of dissipative two-level systems in the stochastic approximation," Phys. Rev. A , 2557-2562 (1997).
  2. P. Ao, S. Grundberg, and J. Rammer, "Influence of typical environments on quantum processes," Phys. Rev. B 53, 10042-59 (1996).
  3. T. P. Pareek and A. M. Jayannavar, "Ground state properties of dissipative two-state system coupled to phonons," Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 9, 1343-1357 (1995). arXiv preprint cond-mat/9505089
  4. S. P. Strong, "Transition between quantum coherence and incoherence," Phys. Rev. E 55, 6636-6640 (1997).

Experiment

  1. X. Fang, X. Zhu, M. Feng, X. Mao and F. Du, "Experimental implementation of dense coding using nuclear magnetic resonance," Phys. Rev. A 61 022307 (2000).
  2. E.Knill, R. Laflamme, R. Martinez, and C-H Tseng, "An algorithmic benchmark for quantum information processing," Nature 404, 368-70 23 March 2000.
  3. R. Laflamme; E. Knill; W. H. Zurek; P. Catasti; S. V. S. Mariappan, "NMR Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states," Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 356, 1941-8 (1998).
  4. M. A. Nielsen, E. Knill, and R. Laflamme, "Complete quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance," Nature 396, 52-4 5 November 1998.
  5. R. J. Nelson, D. G. Cory, and S. Lloyd, "Experimental demonstration of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger correlations using nuclear magnetic resonance," Phys. Rev. A 61, 022106 (2000).
  6. U. Sakaguchi, H. Ozawa, C. Amano, and T. Fukumi, "Microscopic analogs of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger experiment on an NMR quantum computer," Phys. Rev. A 60, 1906-11 (1999).

Books, Conference Proceedings and Special Journal Editions


Return to homepage.


David Collins
Last modified 18 August 2003.